Skip to main content
Biomed Europa

Biomed Europa: A challenge to the pharmaceutical oligopoly

Dana Brown

Dana Brown

Director of the Next System Project more

Health & Wellbeing Democratic Ownership

In his new white paper, “Biomed Europa: after the coronavirus, a public infrastructure to overcome the pharmaceutical oligopoly,” Italian economist Massimo Florio proposes an international, transparent, public pharmaceutical and biomedical institute for Europe that would focus its efforts on the areas of greatest human and social impact. 

Recognizing that “the COVID-19 pandemic has exposed profound weaknesses in a global health system that in the last decades relied…too heavily on the pro-profit private sector for the discovery, development and distribution of new drugs,” Florio proposes Biomed Europa as a way to break Big Pharma’s monopoly on Europe’s medicine supply and assure the public interest is prioritized in medical innovation in the future. 

The model Florio lays out would represent both large-scale international research infrastructure—akin to that of the European Organization for Nuclear Research—as well as a knowledge-intensive public enterprise with an industrial policy mission, similar to that of the European Space Agency. Biomed Europa would be designed to overcome the weaknesses of the current pharmaceutical market, where research priorities are distorted by the profit motive, and would function across the supply chain in order to assure that public-interest drug development and production is successful. 

Similar to the model we at The Democracy Collaborative have developed for the U.S. pharmaceutical sector, Professor Florio suggests Biomed Europa manage its intellectual property in the public interest. The proposed project could become the largest public biomedical institute in the world and the largest single enterprise in the sector, providing an important counterbalance to the political power of Big Pharma. Most importantly, the social benefits of long-term and large-scale public international drug development and production would come from lessened economic effects of severe pathologies, improved quality of life, and social cohesion. 

» Read the full proposal here

Dana Brown

Dana Brown

Director of the Next System Project more

More related work

Health innovation policy for the people

Health innovation policy for the people

Healthcare innovation policy in the United States has yielded some benefits but has also done harm, specifically when it comes o health equity. This paper identifies four such harms and offers recommendations that address the needs of marginalized communities and produces for all of us the innovations we really need. read more
Regeneration not gentrification

A “new direction”: Rediscovering community wealth building in an age of gentrification

To preserve communities in the throes of displacement, cooperative movements and new economy advocates must pivot in a new direction that blends place and the democratic economy. This “new direction” actually borrows from an idea nearly 50 years old. read more
Nenad Stojkovic via Flickr

Gar Alperovitz on how change happens over “pizza and some beer”

Gar Alperovitz talks about how the democratic economy can come into being much as movements did in the 1960s: “Six friends get together and get some pizza and some beer.” read more