Skip to main content
Gar Alperovitz

Gar Alperovitz

Co-Chair of The Next System Project more

Race & Ethnicity

Why must the United States confront its long history of systemic racism?

In a country as diverse as the United States, a short entry cannot do justice to the complex racial history of our nation—from Japanese internment during World War II to the repatriation of hundreds of thousands of Mexican-Americans during the Great Depression.1 Therefore, the following is a necessarily partial and incomplete discussion. Nevertheless, the facts should be stated plainly. The United States was, in many ways, founded on white supremacy—from the three-fifths clause of the Constitution that counted people of color as less than fully human, to the Naturalization Act of 1790 that permitted only “free whites” to become citizens, to the theft of Native American land. Many are familiar, of course, with the long and repugnant history of slavery, yet far fewer acknowledge its role in our country’s economic development or the ways in which racially disparate social policy right up to the present has shaped our current economic realities. In 1860, cotton accounted for 60 percent of US exports.2 That same year, “slaves as an asset were worth more than all of America’s manufacturing, all of the railroads, all of the productive capacity of the United States put together,” according to Yale historian David W. Blight.3 As Sven Beckert, the author of Empire of Cotton, has written, “we cannot know if the cotton industry was the only possible way into the modern industrial world, but we do know that it was the path to global capitalism. We do not know if Europe and North America could have grown rich without slavery, but we do know that industrial capitalism…in fact emerged from the violent caldron of slavery, colonialism, and the expropriation of land.”4

If our nation’s origins and economic foundations are built on systemic injustice, how do we move forward without settling into despair, willful ignorance, or historical amnesia?

Nor is injustice confined to the distant past. During the modern era, the policies that built the middle class of the twentieth century—Social Security, the GI Bill, Federal Housing Administration policy—directly advantaged white families in their design and/or implementation, while excluding communities of color.5 For instance, between 1934 and 1962, the “Federal Housing Administration and the Veterans Administration financed more than $120 billion worth of new housing,” according to UC Santa Barbara Professor George Lipsitz, “… but less than 2 percent of this real estate was available to nonwhite families.”6 Social Security, meanwhile, initially excluded about 65 percent of the black labor force nationally through occupational requirements, and over 70 percent in the South. Given that the present standard of living so many currently enjoy is based on specific past harms—from slavery to FHA redlining—what would constitute a just response?

The disparate impact of these past policies can be seen in the existing racial wealth gap. Today, the family of a white high school dropout has more wealth, on average, than that of a black college graduate.7 A 2015 study by Demos and the Institute for Assets and Social Policy found that the median white household had more than 15 times the wealth of the median Black household and more than 13 times the wealth of the median Latino/Latina household.8 As Dalton Conley, author of Being Black, Living in the Red: Race, Wealth, and Social Policy in America, has stated, the racial wealth gap is, “not explained by other factors like education, earnings rates or savings rates. It is really the legacy of racial inequality from generations past. No other measure captures the legacy—the cumulative disadvantage of race for minorities or cumulative advantage of race for whites—than net worth or wealth.”9

This “past” history is exacerbated by contemporary forms of systemic racism, as the almost weekly procession of black lives extinguished at the hands of the police have demonstrated. Between 2010 to 2012, ProPublica found that young black men were 21 times more likely to be shot by the police than young white men.10

In terms of employment, real-world experiments have shown individuals with white names to receive 50 percent more callbacks for job interviews.11

Other studies have shown white applicants with criminal records to receive job offers at the same rate as black applications with clean records.12 Suggestive of the slow violence of poverty and discrimination, as of 2014, the U.S Department of Health and Human Services reports that white individuals live on average 3.4 years longer than black individuals.13 These systemic examples demonstrate that while interpersonal forms of racism and implicit bias are certainly important, changing hearts and minds is not enough.

How would the Pluralist Commonwealth begin to promote racial equality?

To begin with, racial justice requires acknowledging the many ways that the past is woven into to the present. Facing our nation’s history squarely entails seeing the racial wealth gap as a testament to our nation’s moral failings. But merely acknowledging this history does not undo its harm. Even if equality of opportunity could somehow be granted to all immediately, the racial wealth gap would likely perpetuate itself—as advantage and disadvantage are passed down intergenerationally. In fact, the Institute for Policy Studies has calculated that if recent trends continue, it would take black families 228 years to achieve the wealth that white families held as of 2013.14 For the average Latino or Latina family, it would take 84 years.15 Therefore, if future generations are to ever enjoy an equal starting point, material reparations of some kind are a necessity. Efforts to establish symbolic and cultural restitution through monuments, school curricula, and other means are also important.

It should be noted, in addition, as scholars like Patricia Hill Collins have stressed, that viewing social problems through only a gender, class, or racial lens is inherently limited, and fails to account for the ways in which systems of oppression are interwoven and mutually reinforcing. Therefore, while the present entry and others have introduced specific topics like race or GENDER in isolation for ease of explication, in theory and practice they cannot be divorced. Ignoring the intersectional nature of oppression has long been a fundamental weakness of progressive efforts.

What on-the-ground efforts can be seen working towards our future of collective liberation?

In recent years, the call for racial justice and reparations has issued from many quarters. On the streets, the Black Lives Matters movement has focused national attention on the devastating scale of police violence. Within academia, various proposals and historical research have been succulently summarized by Duke University’s William Darity, for example, who has calculated that present day decedents of slaves are entitled to approximately $400,000 each.16 In Congress, over the last two and a half decades, Representative John Conyers has reintroduced legislation, H.R. 40—the “Commission to Study Reparation Proposals for African-Americans Act,”—whose purpose is self-explanatory.17

In 2016, the Movement for Black Lives, representing more than 50 organizations, has proposed a number of specific policies as part of a reparations framework. These include making higher education available to all and establishing a universal basic income with increased benefits accruing to people of color.18 The Black Youth Project 100 has also called for reparations and has explicitly called for passage of H.R. 40.19 Finally, to take one example that dovetails directly with a Pluralist Commonwealth approach, the Southern Reparations Loan Fund—part of the Southern Grassroots Economies Project—has been established to promote worker cooperatives and community-owned and controlled wealth in the “most marginalized Southern communities” as part of a larger project of reparations.20

If we can be courageous in envisioning a democratic and egalitarian alternative to capitalism, we need to be equally courageous in envisioning a world of racial justice and EQUALITY.21 As these diverse movements and proposals demonstrate, though white supremacy may have been with our nation since its origins, it need not remain part of our future.

See also:

EQUALITY, GENDER

Further reading

Ira Katznelson, When Affirmative Action Was White: The Untold History of Racial Inequality in Twentieth-Century America (New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company, 2005).

Patricia Hill Collins, Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment (New York, NY: Routledge, 2000).

Southern Reparations Loan Fund.

Sven Beckert, Empire of Cotton: A Global History (New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf, 2014).

Ta-Nehisi Coates, “The Case for Reparations,” The Atlantic, June 2014.

Gar Alperovitz

Gar Alperovitz

Co-Chair of The Next System Project more

More related work

Principles of a Pluralist Commonwealth: Introduction

If the design of corporate capitalism is unable to sustain values of equality, genuine democracy, liberty, and ecological sustainability as a matter of inherent systemic architecture, what systemic ‘design’ might ultimately achieve and sustain these values? read more
trade

Trade

Why are current approaches to trade problematic? How would the Pluralist Commonwealth approach trade? What existing efforts point toward a sustainable and just trade regime? read more
Tech

Technology

How do modern researchers understand the deeper sources of economic abundance and technological change? How should the fruits of our common technological inheritance be distributed now and in future? How would the Pluralist Commonwealth deploy management of new technologies in new ways? read more
Regionalism

Regionalism

Why consider long term regional devolution of power? How might long term devolution to regionalist patterns operate in the Pluralist Commonwealth? What are some on-the-ground developments that suggest possibilities for the future of regionalism? read more
public

Public

Why are new forms of public economic institutions important at certain critical levels of scale in the Pluralist Commonwealth? What are the key challenges for public ownership? Where are communities organizing elements of public ownership in the economy? read more

Prehistory

Why is the idea of prehistory important for thinking about systemic change? Are we in the prehistory of genuine systemic change, the prehistory of a Pluralist Commonwealth? read more
Pluralism

Pluralism

Why is pluralism an important value for systemic design? What makes a pluralist commonwealth “pluralist,” and why are more complex forms sometimes important? Where can we see pluralism in action today? read more
Planning

Planning

What is the role of planning in our present economic system? How would planning function in the Pluralist Commonwealth? Where are new models of decentralized and more participatory planning being explored today? read more
Ownership

Ownership

Why is ownership a key determinant of system structure? How does the Pluralist Commonwealth democratize ownership? Where is ownership being transformed in the direction of a Pluralist Commonwealth today? read more
Money

Money

How is money created in the current system? How is money created in the Pluralist Commonwealth? Where can we see key elements of a new approach to monetary policy emerging today? read more

Markets

What’s wrong with markets, and why do we still need them? How does the Pluralist Commonwealth use markets to sustain communities? Where are examples of markets that remain subject to democratic control operative today? read more
Liberty

Liberty

What is liberty? Why must liberty be a central part of the design for the pluralist commonwealth? Where is a renewed conception of liberty being developed on the ground today? read more
Investment

Investment

Why is investment in the current system fundamentally undemocratic and unsustainable? How would a Pluralist Commonwealth democratize investment? Where is investment managed in more democratic directions today? read more

Gender

Why must we factor gender equity into the institutional design of the next political and economic system? What kinds of structures would a Pluralist Commonwealth use to support true gender equality? Where are important elements of a more gender equitable system being built today? read more

Evolutionary Reconstruction And Displacement

How do evolutionary reconstruction and displacement of corporate power differ from “countervailing” strategies of containment and regulation? Why are evolutionary reconstruction and displacement key strategic approaches in the building of a Pluralist Commonwealth? read more

Equality

Why is equality a key part of the Pluralist Commonwealth? How is movement towards equality achieved in the Pluralist Commonwealth? What examples prefigure equality as envisioned in the Pluralist Commonwealth? read more

Economic Growth

Why is growth a challenging problem? How Would the Pluralist Commonwealth Manage Growth? Where can we see on the ground efforts to tackle the growth question today? read more
Economic Change

Economic Change

How does economic change really occur locally and nationally? How, specifically, can we build upon the ways cities and states already foster the local economy to create the Pluralist Commonwealth? What are some examples of shifts toward greater democracy? read more

Ecological Sustainability

Why is pluralism necessary to guarantee ecologically sustainable ends? What are the key strategies for environmental protection in the Pluralist Commonwealth? What are some promising on the ground developments that point toward an ecologically sustainable Pluralist Commonwealth? read more

Democracy

What is democracy? How does the Pluralist Commonwealth build stronger foundations for democratic life? Where are more participatory systemic directions being prototyped and developed today? read more
Decentralization

Decentralization

Why is decentralization a key principle of system design? What are the limits of decentralization? What are some contemporary developments in the direction of decentralization? read more

Culture

Why is culture a key part of the pluralist commonwealth? What are the most important strategies for building such a culture? What are some examples of the development of the cultural transformations toward democratic society at work today? read more

Cooperatives

What are cooperatives? What role do cooperatives play in a Pluralist Commonwealth? Where else is this systemic direction for cooperatives being prototyped and explored today? read more

Community

Why is community important to the pluralist commonwealth? What are institutional mechanisms aimed at undergirding rather than undermining community in a Pluralist Commonwealth? What current developments point towards the restoration of community as a central category? read more

Commonwealth

What does it mean to hold wealth in common? Why is wealth held in common and democratized at various scales, so important for the design of a next system? What are some examples of how “common wealth” builds a “commonwealth” today? read more

Climate Change

What are the challenges presented by global climate change? How does the Pluralist Commonwealth tackle ecological threats such as climate change? What are some promising on the ground developments that point toward an ecologically sustainable Pluralist Commonwealth? read more
bureaucracy

Bureaucracy

Why is bureaucracy problematic? What can be done in a pluralist commonwealth to minimize necessary bureaucracy? What contemporary interventions or potential interventions illustrate democratic control of large-scale entities? read more

America

Why is the Pluralist Commonwealth an American system? What resources for a Pluralist Commonwealth can be found in the American tradition? read more