Skip to main content
Next System Podcast Job Guarantee

“Job Guarantee Now!” with Sarah Treuhaft and Darrick Hamilton

Darrick Hamilton

Darrick Hamilton

Director, Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnicity more

Sarah Treuhaft

Sarah Treuhaft

Managing director, PolicyLink more

Isaiah J. Poole

Isaiah J. Poole

Editorial Manager, The Next System Project more

Luís Garcia de la Cadena

Luís Garcia de la Cadena

Senior Communications Associate more

Democracy & Governance

Voiceover: Jobs, jobs, jobs—that old cliché. It was an oft-repeated slogan in a Florida senator’s early campaign in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis. It used to be that any time the candidate wanted an easy win at a campaign event, they would reference jobs. They’d say they would protect the jobs of their constituents, that they would bring more jobs into their district, that they’d secure the interests of job creators.

Now, as more and more people find themselves moonlighting a side job just to be able to afford going to their main one, or working part-time at three different places, one might start to wonder whether another job is really what we need.

Hi. I’m Luís Garcia de la Cadena, producer of the Next System Podcast. In this episode, we’ll be talking about the job guarantee.

For long-time listeners of the show, you’ll know that we covered this back in December 2017, which truly seems like a lifetime ago now. You’ll recall that the biggest story that month was the Trump tax cuts that were to bring back the so-called booming economy of the 1980s by giving the wealthy elite of this country their own personal stimulus package. Now, three years later, we can see how the “full-employment economy” really looks in full swing. 

Conservatives call this a win but today, we’ll be hearing from two experts on the jobs guarantee who say that’s not enough.

Now, your host, Isaiah J. Poole.

Isaiah J. Poole: Welcome back. Last December, PolicyLink, the National Jobs for All Network, and the Modern Money Network launched the “Job Guarantee Now!” campaign. Their manifesto puts forth a reality where all who need a job with a living wage get one, and where the conditions for joblessness no longer exist. With me is Sarah Treuhaft, Managing Director of Policy Link. Sarah, welcome to the show. 

Sarah Treuhaft: Thank you for having me. 

Isaiah J. Poole: The Jobs Guarantee manifesto has 10 principles. Which would you want to highlight for those just being introduced to it?

Sarah Treuhaft: I would highlight principle No. 10 around a stable economy. Right now, we’re hearing bits around heading into another recession. It’s a possibility, right? It’s been flagged. But if we put a job guarantee in place now, that would stabilize our economy because people would be able to take up job-guaranteed jobs and continue to spend. So, over time a job guarantee would stabilize the economy for people, for businesses – I think that’s an important principle.

The second principle that I would highlight is No. 5 around productive and meaningful work to ensure that projects produce tangible public community benefits and are meeting the needs in communities, especially in distressed communities that have been disinvested in for decades. So we can choose projects and projects should be locally chosen and have community participation that are addressing our climate change challenge that are addressing our need for childcare, for support, for our education system, for caring for the elderly as we experienced this demographic shift. So the products of the work are very important to think about in terms of a job guarantee in addition to the jobs themselves. 

Isaiah J. Poole: Well, one of the things that we learned from a recent Brookings Institute study is that 44% of all workers are low-wage workers with a median income of $18,000 a year. And that certainly speaks to the fact that what may economists and politicians are calling full employment is actually not full employment to the extent that it reflects full prosperity for people. 

Sarah Treuhaft: Right. That statistic, that 44% of workers earn less than $18,000 a year, it’s truly shocking and under the radar screen, given the national discourse around the economy doing well, right? So how do you live on $18,000 a year anywhere in this country? And it’s also unconscionable, given that top CEOs are earning some $19 million per year on average. So working poverty is a huge issue we need to address, and a job guarantee helps do that.

Isaiah J. Poole: Certainly it points to the idea that we shouldn’t be simply creating jobs for the sake of creating jobs, but we really need to make sure that the jobs that we are creating are jobs on which people can live.

Sarah Treuhaft: Absolutely. There’s so much fear around automation and the future of work, and it really is about the future of good jobs, the present providing good jobs. We need strategies that can raise the floor and ensure that all jobs are good jobs.

Isaiah J. Poole: Is there something in your personal life, or your personal experience, that sort of drives your passion around this issue?

Sarah Treuhaft: Yeah. I’m a working-class kid. My parents didn’t go to college. They divorced when I was seven years old. My dad did well for himself. He owned a small business, a used auto and truck parts place. But my mom worked in retail and customer service her whole life, and I saw her struggling with bills and debt, and so I personally was taken care of, I went to college and didn’t have an extreme amount of debt, but I’ve helped my mom as she’s struggled and I’ve seen that. So I have a passion about workers and ensuring all workers are paid what they deserve and paid enough to live on. Also, my mom was tremendously anti-racist, and I now work at PolicyLink, which focuses on racial equity. I want to be part of changing the structures of our society and our economy so that everyone has access to enough to live on and doesn’t need to struggle with piecing together multiple jobs and struggling with debt.

Isaiah J. Poole: Last question: Given that we have just completed a series of presidential debates, it feels to me that this issue is not nearly getting the attention that it deserves. It feels as if that is going to be costly for any candidate who wants to get the support of all of these voters who are struggling with low-wage jobs, that they are not being heard, that they’re not being appealed to.

Sarah Treuhaft: I agree with you. I want to see more discussion of a federal job guarantee in the debates. There is one candidate, Bernie Sanders, who has talked about it, and it’s a core part of his economic policy agenda. He mentioned it in one of the debates. But we need to be making this demand for it, and that is part of why we put out the job guarantee manifesto and will continue to be making that demand, that a federal job guarantee is part of the policy debate and that other candidates get on board with this policy.

Isaiah J. Poole: Sarah, thank you again for joining us. 

Sarah Treuhaft: Thank you.

Isaiah J. Poole: And now, we want to talk to Darrick Hamilton, who’s the executive director of the Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnicity, and a professor of policy and economics at Ohio State University. Darrick, welcome to the podcast.

Darrick Hamilton: Thank you; glad to be here.

Isaiah J. Poole: Now we spoke to you back in 2017 about the jobs guarantee, and one of the first things I want to know is what has changed in the last couple of years, particularly given what we hear in the news all the time about our being in a full-employment economy, people saying there are plenty of jobs out there. You still feel that this jobs guarantee is relevant to today. Why?

Darrick Hamilton: Well, a few things. One, the first part of the question you raised of what has changed, I think momentum is building, despite what is seemingly a good economy if you use all traditional metrics of what a good economy is. Despite that, there is still momentum for big bold ideas to transform our society.

And why did I say, “Traditional measures of what a good economy means”? It is because we end up with the oxymoronic notion of having a job but not a good job. Not a job that has economic security where you know what your pay is going to be from week to week, where you know the number of work hours you have from week to week, where you can count on a pension when you retire, or some health benefits associated with your job, or a wage that can afford livability in an urban area.

All these things still matter.

So just looking at the unemployment rate, which by the way, we know doesn’t capture the people who’ve dropped out of the market, I think it’s not really the best metric of how well we’re doing. We need to rethink how we measure economic well-being. That said, the need is certainly there, the need for a federal job [guarantee] to ensure that we have not only an adequate number of jobs, but an adequate number of good quality jobs, right? So we should be thinking about not just whether there is a quantity of jobs, we should be thinking about quality of jobs, and then the last component I’ll say and then I’ll slow down a little bit, is access. We want to make sure that there is decent access for everyone regardless of your racial background, your gender. So a federal job guarantee doesn’t just provide a quantity of jobs. It provides quality job and it enhances access—and not only for those people who are unemployed or out of the labor market, even those people that are currently working. So if you are employed and your employer is imposing upon you conditions that are not reasonable, that are unbearable—take for example a woman who is working as a waitress and puts up with sexual harassment—having a federal job guarantee at least offers an alternative so that that worker won’t be destitute if they lose that job, and that very well might empower that worker where they are to bargain for better benefits, wages, and working conditions.

Isaiah J. Poole: So what you’re pointing to sounds very much like structural change in the job market. Again, you said not just quantity, but we’re moving toward creating a different kind of workforce where we’re kind of changing the definition of what jobs ought to be, right?

Darrick Hamilton: That is it. We’re looking for transformation. We are at a juxtaposition in society. I mean, we can talk about the moment we’re in. Clearly we have Donald Trump as president and he is the antithesis for some of the policies that we are recommending and talking about. However, his election to me is indicative of a revolution.

Unfortunately, it’s not the revolution that I’m calling for or I’m supporting, but if we think of, certainly, Senator [Bernie] Sanders, he’s talking about a different type of political revolution. And my point in bringing up Donald Trump is the appetite is certainly there in America for big, bold, transformative change. 

The status quo of what we have been doing, that doesn’t seem to be working in America and we are ready for change.

Isaiah J. Poole: So let’s talk about more, a little bit… dig deeper into that. What kinds of reforms would we need given where the economy is right now? Particularly given the way corporations operate, one of the things we have is the gig economy.

So what would you say in terms of structural reforms?

Darrick Hamilton: Yeah, and let me also reiterate what that status quo that we are reacting to has been. That status quo has been 45 years of increasing American productivity where all the gains from that productivity have gone to the wealthy and the upper-middle-class, where real worker wages have remained roughly flat. And that has culminated in a concentration of wealth, where the top 0.1%, those making above $1.5 million a year, own as much of the nation’s wealth as the entire bottom 90%.

So this type of plutocracy where you have that type of concentration and that gives you economic power to impose your political will by using your economic might to buy political desires or outcomes, that is problematic and not sustainable. So that is what we’re reacting to.

Isaiah J. Poole: What you reminded me of—I don’t know if you’re familiar with Jacob Hacker.

Darrick Hamilton: Mm-hmm (affirmative).

Isaiah J. Poole: His book, The Great Risk Shift.

Darrick Hamilton: Great book.

Isaiah J. Poole: He talks about how all of the economic risks have shifted to those of us who are on the bottom of the economic ladder, in addition to all of the gains and benefits rising to the top.

Darrick Hamilton: There’s a few books that are out there that are describing the moment that we’re in and how we got here. Some that stand out are [Thomas] Piketty’s book. Another book that stands out is Nancy MacLean’s book, where she talks about the strategy that was involved in fusing this neoliberal movement, how intentional it was, where the rhetoric of market-based solutions as the great arbiter—efficient, colorblind, allocator, fair—and it was that this neoliberal movement was imposed by strategically using race.

The imagery of undeserving welfare queens, deadbeat dads, and super-predators, that was clearly racialized. Dog whistle, dog-whistle work. So this is the moment that we’re in. And I think after seeing 45 years of what was supposed to be a dynamic economy that would trickle down to all of us, I think the public has now caught up in the…what’s the right word? The con is over, maybe that’s the more accurate way to describe it.

So we again, if we think about the political moment, we’re at a point where we have somebody who can come in with despotic rhetoric about building a wall, making America great again, or the other term that he used that didn’t get as much play in his campaign was I’m your last chance. And what was he-

Isaiah J. Poole: “Only I can fix it.”

Darrick Hamilton: Not only I can fix it, I’m your last chance against this demographic shift in which Whites will no longer be a numerical majority. So it’s not a coincidence that he went after the Latinx population, whose population size is expected to grow, and by the way, demography is not going to save us so this notion that Whites will be a numerical minority and then we’ll have a racially inclusive society, don’t count on it because the definition of White changes over time. White really is a placeholder for what means the in group.

What really drives this system is having the persistent underclass which is Black, which is why we have these anti-Black policy.

So that’s one way that America can go, and that’s a scary future for us. Another way for us to go is to think about an iteration in our rights frame from civil rights to economic rights, where we start thinking about the use of public power, the enormous use of our public power to enable structures and resources so that people have what they need to be their best selves and have self-determination and agency in their lives.

What will that entail? Federal job guarantee. What will that entail? A right to health insurance. What will that entail? A right to the finance. We need to think about public banking, where people who are low-income are not at the whim of a finance system but have access to an adequate account, have access to some liquidity so that when there’s a short-term fall in their ability to pay their bills, they can get credit at reasonable terms. Have access to credit more generally so that they can purchase an asset that will appreciate over their lives.

This is the society that I think would be a more perfect evolution in American history. And then I’ll say this and then I’ll stop for a while, I know I’m rambling on: We need to be race-conscious when we do this. We need to ensure that in this iteration of an economic Bill of Rights, in this iteration that’s reacting to corporate power that has gone out of control, similar to how the Gilded Age, we had a consolidation of corporate power that nearly collapsed the American economy, and in response we had the New Deal, we need to make sure in this iteration of a New Deal, in this iteration of an economic bill of rights, that we are intentionally racially inclusive.

Isaiah J. Poole: So let’s talk about one of the steps that you put forward to get to this place. You had legislation with Senator Cory Booker (D-N.J.) that would have allowed for a pilot of a jobs guarantee in about 15 communities. So how would that have worked?

Darrick Hamilton: So congratulations to Senator Booker for having the boldness to put forth that legislation, and there were several other co-sponsors as well. I should point out that Representative Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), as well as Senator Sanders, are talking about a full comprehensive federal job guarantee. It’s not even just the pilot but rather full implementation.

But it would work really as it says, that the federal government would be a guarantor of employment to ensure that everyone who desires to work would have access to a job, and not just any job like we’ve been discussing, a job with adequate wages, adequate benefits, and here’s another key point and it relates to the Green New Deal, a job that is improving upon our public infrastructure. In some ways that these federal jobs would be different from perhaps the New Deal where we had the CCC [Civilian Conservation Corps] and the WPA [Works Progress Administration], is that we would perhaps be even more intentional about human infrastructure investments as well.

For example, we could create an entire care economy with these federal job guarantees to ensure that there’s quality care from child care, adult care, elder care, all the way throughout our life horizon that people have access to the care that’s needed, for example. And then green our economy: Imagine using the federal job guarantee to make us sustainable to deal with the fact that this climate crisis is going to have distributional effects where those that are most vulnerable, Blacks, Latinx, other vulnerable groups, low-income Whites, that we have the federal government intervening in a way to not only reverse, I shouldn’t say not only because this is tremendous, reverse the course of Earth’s degradation, but to do it in a way that’s equitable.

Isaiah J. Poole: And there’s the big pay-for question, which I know you have an answer for.

Darrick Hamilton: Well, one problem is we start with the scarcity frame when we think about these big bold ideas. So I’m going to get to your answer but I’m going to talk a little bit about framing. We certainly don’t ask this question when we think about, and I say this sobering, sending a bomb to Iran, which unfortunately is obviously problematic. We certainly don’t think about the pay-for question when we’re thinking about military intervention. That becomes not even part of the conversation. 

Isaiah J. Poole: But more importantly, we didn’t think about it when we did the corporate tax cuts a couple years ago.

Darrick Hamilton: Exactly. That greater-than-$2 trillion over the next decade tax cut, that pay for question wasn’t asked at all. So let’s put that into context first. And is that tax cut going to destroy the economy? The answer is no, it’s not going to destroy the economy. It’s going to shift the economy in an unjust way where those that are at the top will be more enriched. It’s going to lead to greater racial dispersion as a result of that tax cut. When we think about, for example, people not being able to deduct their state and local taxes the way they have in the past, that’s going to impose upon states the need to have austerity policy because they are not like the federal government where they can run deficits the way the federal government can, and as a result they will have to increase fines, fees, and other sources of revenue. And who are most vulnerable to that? Those that have less political and economic power. So we will see greater impacts on certain racial groups as a result.

So those are all examples of distortions that are predatory as a result of this tax cut that’s going to enrich those that are in more elite positions either through the corporate sector or simply having a whole lot of their resources in the form of non-wage income, for example. So that’s the context that we’re thinking about this pay-for question., that one, the federal government has great amount of resources to pay for things. But then we can also think about the cost savings that would come along from a federal job guarantee, such as our public social safety net would not be one that’s simply dealing with subsistence but rather one that’s trying to impose upon economic mobility, but it would result in some cost savings from other types of federal subsidy we would have to give, because now people would have adequate income and a job that’s productive.

So the price tag is large but the benefits far outweigh the price tag. When we think about communities that are suffering from low wages and unemployment, not only does it impose economic costs, it imposes mental costs, psychological costs on a community. It leads to incarceration. We can keep going on and on and I can even give you specific numbers about the price tag, but frankly, it might not be the best use of our time. But I have written with co-authors that actually lay out a plan for a federal job guarantee, and certainly if readers are interested please check out a Russell Sage Press publication that’s co-authored with William Darity, Mark Paul, and myself which would describe some of the details of a federal job guarantee.

Isaiah J. Poole: Certainly the federal government in a way has proven that if we can go into debt for corporate tax cuts, we can certainly go into debt for reinvesting in our people and in our communities.

Darrick Hamilton: Yes, and it would have a stimulating effect as well. It would generate a stimulus to the economy that would create a multiplier that would actually grow our economy in a just way. It would lead to economic growth. So we’re talking about investments in productive use, both physical and human infrastructure, which history has shown us through the New Deal that our economy will grow as a result.

I should also mention another aspect of it. It provides regional balance. So those areas that are perhaps in economic decline, suffering from unemployment, well that is where the stimulus will go towards in a disproportionate way, and as a result we would have more balanced growth and communities that are in despair, Black or White, would benefit a great deal from a federal job guarantee. And as we have this more equitable growth, you know what else it will lead to? Greater civic engagement. Social equity leads to civic engagement, people will feel better about their society, more invested in it.

And perhaps some of the racism that we’re seeing, some of the anxiety about—”anxiety” is not the right word—some of the bigotry around religious affiliation. If we have a more collective society that has economic balance, civic engagement goes up and so will some of that stratification around identity politics that really we hope kind of goes away.

Isaiah J. Poole: Thinking strategically about how you advance a policy like this, you mentioned that there is the national program at the federal level, there is legislation that would pilot this at the federal level in a few places, and presumably if people like the results of that then it would spread nationally.

What about the idea of cities and states taking this on themselves and not waiting for Washington?

Darrick Hamilton: They need not wait for Washington, as you point out. One constraint on cities and states that Washington doesn’t have is deficits. They can’t run deficits the way Washington can. And by the way, part of the problem with our society is demonizing that word deficit. There is no problem with the federal government investing in its most valued resource, and that’s its people. The problem is if we run deficit spending on things like a tax cut that distorts our economy in a way that leads to plutocracy, where we enhance the power of one group at the expense of others; a problem in our society if we used deficit spending for weapons of destruction.

But if we’re using deficit spending on our greatest assets, its people, perhaps even using the term deficit is not the right word. It’s an investment in America’s future, and that is the way we should be thinking about spending our resources.

But back to your question, there are certain municipalities, take New York City for example. I’m going to give you a number because I don’t know the number. I think the New York City budget is something in the area of $90 billion. So if New York’s budget is about $90 billion, a place like New York City most certainly has capacity to think about targeted jobs that are guaranteed in some way.

I mean, New York City could, for example, say, “We will pick neighborhoods that reach a certain level of unemployment. And if a resident, you know, we want to avoid gentrification, if you’re from that neighborhood and can demonstrate that you’ve resided in this neighborhood say five, 10 years prior or something like that, then you will be eligible for a productive job with a decent wage and decent benefits.”

How transformative could this be? And those jobs could go towards enhancing New York City’s infrastructure. Like I said, physical and human infrastructure. So we don’t have to wait on the federal government. But ultimately, the federal government is the endgame of where we get this so that it’s permanent, sustainable. But, you know, as you kind of alluded in the question, politics are local, and we can begin local and build up until we get the transformation that we desire.

Isaiah J. Poole: Here in DC, in fact, the summer jobs program that started under Mayor Marion Barry back in the 1980s, for young people I think between the ages of 16 to 19, the city guaranteed every young person a job. So it reminds me that such a thing is possible. It’s been done on a small scale with teenagers. Imagine if you could build on that.

Darrick Hamilton: Absolutely. I mean we have precedent. We can look in DC, as you pointed out, but frankly we can look in American history. We have precedent with the CCC, the WPA of, in this case, federal government enacting it, but it being administered at the local level where masses of unemployed people were employed almost overnight.

Isaiah J. Poole: So how do you see this unfolding over the next few months in terms of the momentum to drive the effort?

Darrick Hamilton: Yeah, I mean what I see happening is we are at a juxtaposition in society. We risk having a myopic approach that’s transactional where we’re thinking about what seems feasible, and I put the word “seems” in there intentionally, in a manner that we sacrifice our values. I hope that doesn’t happen. The alternative, and where I believe in investing myself in how we can go, is towards some bold, values-driven vision where we don’t compromise on certain things such as economic inclusion, civic engagement, social equity; that we think about transformative policies again in this economic rights frame that are grounded in dignity, that are grounded in morality. We start thinking about a moral economy. A whole lot of credit to the Poor People’s Campaign with leaders like Rev. William Barber and others, where they’re talking about economic justice being a moral imperative. This is where we need to be going.

But we need to get to the point where political economy is about using public power to curtail out of control corporate power, but to do more than that. Public power being used to empower its people, empower its people with certain essential goods that should not be at the whim of the market using some price rationing mechanism to determine access, to determine quality, and to determine quantity. That as a society we make a decision that all of our people will have adequate health insurance. That as a society we make a decision that all of our people will have access to not only grade school education, but education from kindergarten all the way through college.

These are things that we can afford. These are things that we can do. This is the transformation that we need to get to reverse that trend of inequality from the last 45 years where we believed in some rhetorical aspirations that this mythical market was somehow natural, was somehow colorblind, was somehow efficient and a great arbiter of who is worthy and who is not worthy.

Isaiah J. Poole: Well, Darrick Hamilton, thank you very much.

Darrick Hamilton: Thank you.

Voiceover: That’s it for this week on the Next System Podcast. Thank you again to Sarah Treuhaft of PolicyLink and Darrick Hamilton of the Kirwan Institute for taking the time to interview with us. Special thanks to Zoë Blade, whose music can be heard at the beginning of this podcast.

Remember that you can see a transcript of this episode, plus find previous editions, at Thank you for tuning in, and we’ll catch you on the next one. 


Darrick Hamilton

Darrick Hamilton

Director, Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnicity more

Sarah Treuhaft

Sarah Treuhaft

Managing director, PolicyLink more

Isaiah J. Poole

Isaiah J. Poole

Editorial Manager, The Next System Project more

Luís Garcia de la Cadena

Luís Garcia de la Cadena

Senior Communications Associate more

More related work


Earth Day at 50

Earth Day at 50: The movement’s past in dialogue with its future

Gus Speth was active in the first Earth Day 50 years ago. Dulce Arias is a climate activist prepared to take the movement 50 years into the future. Together in The Next System Podcast they assess the successes and failures of the past and how a new generation is applying those lessons in an era of climate crisis. read more


Moms 4 Housing sign

Direct action, moms and a housing crisis

How a takeover by four women of vacant housing in Oakland, California is helping drive systemic solutions to the housing crisis. read more


The Next System Podcast Episode 45

Talking racial trauma, healing and reparations with La June Montgomery Tabron

The CEO of the W.K. Kellogg Foundation is leading a “truth, racial healing and transformation” effort that is ultimately designed to dismantle the discriminatory systems that have prevented families and communities from thriving. read more


The end of employee ownership at New Belgium

The end of employee ownership at New Belgium and why that matters

New Belgium Brewing was held up as a shining example of what could be possible through worker ownership. But its recent purchase by an international conglomerate raises questions about the best strategy and models for pursuing worker ownership. read more


Marjorie Kelly and Ted Howard speaking at Busboys and Poets.

On “The Making of a Democratic Economy” with Marjorie Kelly and Ted Howard

Majorie Kelly and Ted Howard have spent the past several months talking about their book, “The Making of a Democratic Economy.” They now share what they’ve learned and how it connects to the issues facing the country at the start of a new decade. read more


In-depth with Clark Arrington, a pioneer for cooperatives and black economic power (Part 2)

Democratic economy legal pioneer Clark Arrington talks about what happens when he took his cooperative vision to Africa, and what he’s up to today to help cooperatives assemble capital. read more


Next System Podcast with Clark Arrington

In depth with Clark Arrington, a pioneer for cooperatives and black economic power (Part 1)

An exclusive conversation with a pioneer in the cooperative movement in both the US and Africa and a leader in the fight for Black economic power. read more


Rise against predatory landlords

The homes guarantee: A promise of housing for people, not profit

We talk to people at the front lines of the nation’s housing affordability crisis and activists fighting for a “homes guarantee,” a set of systemic solutions based on the principle that housing is a human right. read more


The Next World podcast discusses school to prison pipeline

Reparations, the Green New Deal, and the school-to-prison pipeline

From our peers at “The Next World: A Podcast About Building Movements,” a talk with Zakiya Sankara-Jabar of the Dignity in Schools Campaign about the criminalization of black children, plus journalist Sarah Lazare on critical questions about the Green New Deal. read more


Democratizing power in rural America through electric co-ops

Democratizing power in rural America through electric co-ops

In this episode, we’re discussing how to further democratize rural electric cooperatives and what that means for the communities that these institutions serve. read more


Reparations and the Democratic Economy

Four hundred years after the first African slaves were brought to America—the initial act of America’s “original sin”—the discussion of reparations has gained a new level of seriousness. read more


Tools are hung on a wall of a workshop with different colors overlapping over them.

Election-year debate: “Wish-list economics” or necessary transformation?

The Democracy Collaborative weighs in on “wish-list economics,” making the case that in the face of extreme crises radical solutions are practical solutions. read more


The policy approach to mainstreaming worker ownership

Worker ownership is now on the agenda of the 2020 presidential campaign. We discuss the proposals and how they address issues of worker power and economic inequality with Next System Project Policy Associate Peter Gowan and Mo Manklang of the US Federation of Worker Cooperatives. read more


Designing our communities for justice

Especially in light of the climate crisis, how can communities plan for their infrastructure needs with justice and inclusion at the forefront? The Next System Project’s Johanna Bozuwa, the Institute for Policy Study’s Basav Sen, and We Act for Environmental Justice’s Michael Velarde offer insights. read more


Social wealth funds as vehicles of economic empowerment

Gabriel Acevero, Jhumpa Bhattacharya, and Matt Bruenig discuss how social wealth funds work and the transformative role they can play in the financial security of individuals and communities. read more


Keep it in the ground

How we power down the fossil fuel machine

Confronting the fossil fuel industry is the first step in achieving a livable future. We discuss how we take on the industry once and for all. read more


Participatory budgeting: When government really is by the people

This week we are talking about deepening democracy in our communities through participatory budgeting and participatory decision making more broadly. read more


Financing the green transition

Financing the green transition

Meeting the goal of transitioning away from fossil fuels by 2030 will require new thinking about how to pay for that transition. On this episode of The Next System Podcast, we talk to a banker, a climate and public banking activist, and a Next System Project researcher about that challenge. read more


From private profit to public alternatives

Public ownership is gaining ground against privatization—here’s why neoliberalism’s narrative is falling apart and why the people are taking back the economy. read more


Sunrise Movement Green New Deal demonstration Congress

The Green New Deal and the shift to a new economy

There is more at stake in the “Green New Deal” than protecting the planet from the threat of climate change; it’s also a chance to confront the inequities of the current economy. Johanna Bozuwa, research associate at The Next System Project; Anthony Torres, a campaign strategist at the Sierra Club; and Evan Weber, political director and co-founder of the Sunrise Movement, discuss the broader goals that the Green New Deal movement must achieve. read more


Shopping Cart Perched on Cliff

When “growing the economy” is not the right answer: Moving to sustainability

A deep dive into the fundamental transformations businesses must make to be truly sustainable, beyond superficial greenwashing. read more


A HOLC redlining map superimposed on a row of vacant houses

What banks owe communities: Towards a 21st century Community Reinvestment Act

Isaiah J. Poole and Devin Case-Ruchala discuss the future and yet-to-be-fulfilled potential of a landmark community investment law with John Holdsclaw and Gregory Jost, community development experts and practitioners. read more


Overhead views of New York and LA with a bank icon superimposed across them

The Campaign for Public Banks, From Coast to Coast

David Jette, the co-founder and legislative director of Public Bank LA, and Juleon Robinson, a program associate at the New Economy Project working on a campaign to establish a municipal bank in New York City, discuss the nationwide movement to establish public banks, including a landmark ballot measure in Los Angeles. read more


Episode 24: The Antidote to the Amazon Economy

Stacy Mitchell, Co-Director of the Institute for Local Self-Reliance (ILSR) joins Adam Simpson and special co-host Katie Parker to discuss how locally-minded economics would change our communities. read more


Episode 23: Community Control of Land and Housing

The Democracy Collaborative’s Senior Research Fellow, Jarrid Green, joins the Next System Podcast to discuss his new report on community control of land and housing, which includes a discussion of actionable policies that cities can take to push back against gentrification and build community wealth. read more


Episode 22: The Preston Model for Economic Revival

Matthew Brown joins the Next System Podcast to talk about the community wealth building movement in the UK. read more


Episode 21: Worker Cooperatives & System Change with Esteban Kelly

What role can worker coops play as part of a movement for system change? read more


red and blue fists are sprawled over a yellow-orange background

Episode 20: Towards the Inclusive Workers’ Movement of the Future (W/ Dorian Warren)

Dorian Warren joins the Next System Podcast to discuss the future of the labor movement, organizing for racial equity and an inclusive economy, and more. read more


a map of the united states is colored in blue, excepting the counties of appalachia which are colored red with a paisley pattern

Episode 19: Extraction & Resilience in Appalachia (w/Elizabeth Catte)

Elizabeth Catte, author of What You Are Getting Wrong About Appalachia, talks about what simple narratives explaining place-based poverty miss. read more


Episode 18: The New Abolitionism & Monetary Freedom (w/Delman Coates)

Learning from a faith based strategy to engage communities as advocates for heterodox monetary policy. read more


on a field with flowers, the word commons is displayed with a ghostly geometric pattern underneath the image.

Episode 17: Social Transformation Through ‘The Commons’ (w/ David Bollier)

How the commons give us a frame to think against enclosures and towards a next system. read more


Episode 16: “Resist & Build”: Discussing the Solidarity Economy (w/ Emily Kawano)

Emily Kawano discusses the solidarity economy as the end and means of system change. read more


a wall is half covered in graffiti, in the top half, which is mostly unadorned, the word 'DECOLONIZE' is painted in large black and white letters

Episode 15: How Communities Can Take Control of Their Police (w/ Max Rameau)

Why “community policing” isn’t going to end police violence, and what real community control of policing could look like. read more


Episode 14: The Job Guarantee & Social Justice (w/ Pavlina Tcherneva)

Why guaranteeing everyone a job can both win crucial gains for all workers and build power to meet community needs. read more


Episode 13: Building the Caring Majority (w/ Sarita Gupta)

How do we organize to build a system that truly recognizes the existence and importance of care work? read more


Episode 12: Black Power Vs. Black Capitalism (w/ Nishani Frazier)

Nishani Frazier discusses the history of CORE’s work for community-based economic development in Cleveland and the potential of today’s new radical black mayors. read more


Over a yellow background icons representing buses, trains, radio towers, and utility towers form interlocking patterns

Episode 11: The Transformative Potential of Public Ownership (w/Andrew Cumbers)

Andrew Cumbers discusses democratic public ownership of industry, large and small. read more


Gar Alperovitz's head shot to the left of the image, a spiral pattern in white and blue is to the right.

Episode 10.2: The Pluralist Commonwealth (w/Gar Alperovitz)

Gar Alperovitz discusses how what he calls the “pluralist commonwealth” charts a course beyond our current broken economic system. read more


Gar Alperovitz is on the right side of the screen, with icons from from left to right signifying his time in Wisconsin, his work on the decision to drop the atomic bomb, his work with MLK jr., and his antiwar efforts during Vietnam.

Episode 10.1: System Change, Past & Present (w/Gar Alperovitz)

Gar Alperovitz describes his journey toward system change. read more


Episode 9: Energizing Democracy By Democratizing Energy w/Denise Fairchild

A conversation with the co-editor of “Energy Democracy: Advancing Equity in Clean Energy Solutions” read more


a clear image of a protest is scene through the lens of a camera

Episode 8: The Next System of Media w/Laura Flanders

Independent journalist Laura Flanders discusses the next system of media on our latest podcast. read more


A blue globe with solar panels and windmills and forests on its edges floats in a pink sky

Episode 7: Why Climate Change Necessitates System Change w/Gus Speth

Environmental leader James Gustave Speth joins the Next System Podcast to discuss his own journey toward system change as well as the past, present, and future of the environmental movement. read more


Four fractal trees creep out from the center of the screen. A horizontal line runs across the screen, white on top, red on the bottom.

Episode 6: Capital Bias vs. Generative Design w/ Marjorie Kelly

This week, Adam sits down with Marjorie Kelly to find out why she believes that we need a new language to talk about the way capital creates inequality, and why worker ownership is fundamental to building a new economy. read more


A blue and green sphere hangs in space, the sphere is divided down the middle with a human face on the left, a world on fire on the right.

Episode 5: Toward Climate Justice w/ Jacqueline Patterson & Basav Sen

The NAACP’s Jacqueline Patterson and IPS’ Basav Sen define and discuss climate justice on the Next System Podcast. read more


A silhouette of person cutting wires frames an image of a set of wrenches. The background appears to be a damaged industrial setting, a concrete wall with pink splotches.

Episode 4: Darrick Hamilton on the racial wealth gap & the job guarantee

On the Next System Podcast, Darrick Hamilton discusses his work as a “stratification economist” on the racial wealth gap in the US and why we need a federal job guarantee. read more


wind turbines and stacks of cash are displayed over a dark, forest green background

Episode 3: Carbon tax & Social Dividends w/ Jeremiah Lowery & Camila Thorndike

Can tax and dividend strategy simultaneously combat inequality and climate change? read more


A delicious donut with pink frosting is used to depict the basics of Kate Raworth's 'Doughnut Economics' model.

Episode 2: Kate Raworth on ‘Doughnut Economics’

How can a doughnut help us understand what outdated economic narratives leave out, and help us build the economics we need for the 21st century? read more


A caterpillar turns into a chrysalis, and then into a butterfly.

Ep. 1: Gar Alperovitz & Gus Speth on the Next System

NSP Co-Chairs discuss the current political context and the pathways toward transformation. read more